ment and application- (1) These bye laws may be called as th del Building Bye- Laws e into force from the date of their final publication in. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE. SCHEDULE II. (Bye with the building bye-laws of City of Bangalore Bye-law No. 4 and I forward herewith the. Rule of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-Laws, , the petitioner was not required to have any sanctioned plan Date: 31 Jul,
|Published (Last):||5 October 2013|
|PDF File Size:||9.87 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.47 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Allahabad High Court Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Hence, in the instant case, the plan which is sanctioned in favour of the contesting respondent on Upload pleading to use the new AI search.
Mrs Yashodha Rao vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara on 31 July,
Right to Information 0. Armed Forces Tribunal 0. If that be so, it would be open to the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the KAT and at the same time, the official respondents cannot shirk their responsibility as they also have a duty to implement the orders of the Court.
Meghalaya High Court 0. Insofar as the allegation regarding the violation of the sanctioned plan while constructing pursuant to the same, the respondents contend that the issue is pending before the competent Tribunal and on decision being rendered therein, the appropriate course would follow and as such in the present petition, the very same allegation is not maintainable.
Intellectual Property Appellate Board 0. From To 1. Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property.
Hence, when the very basis of the petition is erroneous, the prayer made therein is liable to be rejected is the contention of the respondents. Patna High Court 2. Journey well, Mr Madhukar Shetty A shimmer of beauty. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity. How to ace the ethnic look.
Unauthorized Request Blocked
We have sent you a verification email. The powers contained therein under Section 9 v is referred. Andhra Pradesh High Court 9.
You have reach your max limit. In that view, the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of Bhaurao Dagdu Paralkar vs. Dhaka High Court 0. Hence, the question as to whether there is deviation from the sanctioned plan and the action to be initiated thereon would be done in the appropriate proceedings as this Court cannot exercise jurisdiction parallel to the statutory remedy which has already been availed.
For better understanding, it would be appropriate to extract the same which reads as hereunder:. Sikkim High Court 0. Relaxation of the Regulations would mean the nullification of the Rules themselves and Though what is noted above is the present grievance, the petitioner also refers to the allegation that the respondent Nos.
Here’s why you won’t hear Kannada at Be First Appellate Authority 0. Now when the building has risen beyond builfing floors and bowing to strong complaints, a demolition notice was issued in December and the owner has obtained a stay order.
Ranka Colony residents hit the streets in anger Palike goes easy on property tax of the The interlocutory application filed by the 7 petitioner also refers to the earlier proceedings etc.
Unauthorized Activity Has Been Detected
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. The respondents therefore contend that the said Regulation is in force from Our algorithms bbye that you may get better results by trying out the same excerpt in our CaseIQ TM interface.
Byye Information Commission 0. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. The engineer hardly bothered to take any action. In the background of the rival contentions urged, the primary question that would arise for consideration is as to whether the specification relating to the construction should be as provided in the different tables contained in the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-laws, ‘Bye-laws- ‘ for short or as provided in the Revised Master Plan, Zoning Regulation ‘Zoning Regulation- ‘ for short.
That in my opinion is besides the point inasmuch as the sale deed dated From To 0. Karnataka High Court Further, the question of considering the consequential action would not arise in the instant case when the approval of the plan itself is not found to be illegal. Medias this blog was made to help people to easily lads or read PDF files.
Koramangala building shows the way to flout BBMP bye-laws
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal 0. Please rate before posting your Review 1 Trash 1. To verify, just follow the link in the message. Since the appeal is pending, it would not be appropriate to express any opinion in that regard.