How should a judge’s moral convictions bear on his judgments about what the law In Justice in Robes, Ronald Dworkin argues that the question is much more. $ – Ronald Dworkin’s work Justice in Robes is a broad-ranging defense of the adjudication. In the course of this apologia, Dworkin also engages in the. Justice in Robes () & Scott Hershovitz, ed.,. Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of. Ronald Dworkin ()). Brian Leiter. Follow this and additional.
|Published (Last):||8 June 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.46 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. How should a judge’s moral daorkin bear on his judgments about what the law is?
Justice in Robes — Ronald Dworkin | Harvard University Press
Lawyers, sociologists, philosophers, politicians, and judges all have answers to that question: In Justice in RobesRonald Dworkin argues that the question is much more complex than it has often been taken to be and charts a variety of dimensions—semantic, jurisprudential, and doctrinal—in which law and morals are undoubtedly interwoven. He restates and summarizes his own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticizes the most influential rival theories to his own.
He argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory ij law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalism reflects an dwoorkin view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority.
In the course of that critical study he discusses the work of many of the most influential lawyers and philosophers of the era, including Isaiah Berlin, Richard Posner, Cass Sunstein, Antonin Scalia, and Joseph Raz.
Dworkin’s new collection of essays and original chapters is a model of lucid, logical, and impassioned reasoning that will advance the crucially important debate about the roles of justice in law. Valerie Knowles is an Ottawa writer who has taught history and worked as an archivist. In addition to writing for newspapers, magazines, and federal government justicee, she has published several non-fiction works, including Strangers at Justie Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, This is her third book for Dundurn Press.
Account Options Sign in. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Harvard University Press Amazon.
Harvard University Press- Law – pages. User Review – Flag as inappropriate ok. Contents Pragmatism and Law.
Justice in Robes
In Praise of Theory. Harts Postscript and the Point of Political Philosophy.
The Concepts of Law. Rawls and the Law. Justice in Robes Ronald Dworkin No preview available – Common terms and phrases abortion abstract accept jusyice agree answer Antonin Scalia argue argument better Chapter citizens claims of law clauses Coleman concept of law conception of legality constitutional controversial convention convictions course criteria decide decision declared defend democracy deny describe disagree distinction doctrinal concept Equal Protection Clause equality example fact fidelity H.
Hart Hart Hart’s Ibid identify important insist integrity issues John Rawls Joseph Raz judicial jurisprudential justice justify Law’s Empire legal philosophers legal positivism legal practice legal reasoning legal theory legislation liberty matter mean ment moral jusgice moral theory natural kind normative officials particular political morality political values positivists Posner pragmatism pragmatist propositions of law question Rawls Rawls’s Raz’s requires responsibility Ronald Dworkin rule Scalia semantic sense share Sorenson’s sources thesis structure substantive Sunstein suppose Supreme Court theoretical theory of law thought tion true truth conditions understanding value pluralism.
Justice in Robes Ronald Dworkin Snippet view –