This question examined the students' knowledge of the interactions between how Congress can limit the power of the bureaucracy through the use of both. Congress and a system of bureaucratic oversight that re-.,. u, investigatory .. Figure 1 Relationship between Relative White House Influ. Number of. In this lesson, we will examine the relationship between the bureaucracy and Congress. We will focus especially on congressional powers to.
When we're talking about 2. Or they might not even know all of the details. But they try to do the committee hearings in order to get a reasonable understanding of what's going on and then leverage their budgetary powers in order to have some level of oversight.
Now to get a feel for what this looks like, I'm about to show you an example of a Senate committee hearing. And this is a committee hearing where they brought in some folks from the FBI. And what's interesting about this one, this is not about national security.
This committee hearing is about relocating or where they put the Federal Bureau of Investigation agency buildings. And you can see that there's definitely a tone of oversight in this video. Matthews, I'm having a hard time accepting what you're saying here. So I'ma be perfectly blunt about that. You now say a major reason for terminating the original prospectus was that the transfer of the Hoover Building, something that you all wanted, and we didn't want. Congress didn't like that idea.
But you said it was something you needed to do to get it done. So now we're supposed to believe that's the reason why you terminated for something that you wanted.
Secondly, the consolidation, one of the major reasons for the consolidation on costs is to save rental costs.
That's what you've told us all along. That it's more expensive to have places outside of the central location. And now you're saying it's a wash. Can you understand why I'm hanging a hard time accepting the information you're presenting?
So with respect to your first question, the issue-- - And quickly 'cause I heard-- we have your written statement on the transfer of the buildings.
I agree with you on the transfer of the building. But you insisted on it. It was thought that the people might make an unwise decision depending on who ran for office.
Congressional oversight of the bureaucracy (video) | Khan Academy
The Founding Fathers thus wanted a way to temper the will of the people. By design each state was provided with the same number of electors as they had members of Congress U. The electors were not required to vote according to the outcome of the popular vote, though they could take it into consideration.
Once the ballots of the electors were cast, they were sealed and sent to the U. A candidate for president had to receive a majority of the electoral votes cast.
Congressional oversight of the bureaucracy
If no candidate received a majority, then the election was settled by the House of Representatives. This part of the electoral system survives to today.
After the presidency of George Washington, the results of the use of the Electoral College were mixed. The election of was the first to provide controversy.
Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr both received equal numbers of electoral votes, and the House was required to settle the election. It took 36 ballots for the House to finally choose Jefferson as president, and there were charges of corruption and deals to finally break the deadlock.
The election of finally brought about some changes in the way the Electoral College functioned. In Andrew Jackson overwhelmingly won the popular vote and received the most electoral votes, but not a majority. The House of Representatives decided that John Quincy Adams was a better choice for president than Jackson and chose him, which left supporters of Jackson quite unhappy.
In Jackson was finally elected president. At his behest, the states decided to change how electors voted. Electoral votes were now tied to the popular vote.
The Presidency and the Bureaucracy
A new provision called unit rule was implemented, which required that whichever candidate won the most votes in the popular vote then they were to be given all of the electoral votes from that state. Bush and Al Gore. Though there has been considerable criticism of this system of choosing the president there have been no fundamental changes to how it works since Jackson.