What is the relationship between the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit
The Christian doctrine of the Trinity holds that God is one God, but three coeternal consubstantial persons or hypostases—the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit—as "one God in three .. This threefold relation [of Father, Son and Spirit] soon found fixed expression in the triadic formulae in 2 Cor. and in. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to be 5 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: 6. The following clearly and briefly explains the Trinity three gods or one? The Bible clearly speaks of: God the Son, God the Father, and God the Holy Spirit. But emphasizes Jesus was so clear about his unique relationship with the Father.
God's Word Jesus Himself is truth. Christ and His Spirit dwell in our Hearts according to the scripture. According to 1st John 3: The Holy Spirit proceed from the Father. The word proceed has many sub words in Strong's Greek dictionary number G Each of them describe the action of the Holy Spirit beginning His work on the earth. What we experience with the Holy Spirit is better than having Jesus who was and is one with God the Father present with us on the earth today.
It is unknown exactly why Christ is at the right hand of Majesty on High and the Holy Spirit was sent here. The Holy Spirit is very kool to be able to fill the void of Christ in a better way than Christ Himself. So here we notice the Holy Spirit is better for us than Christ physical presence on the Earth. The primary work of the Holy Spirit on those in the world is to reprove or you could say convict of sin, righteousness and judgement.
To be convicted means to be pronounced guilty. It is often thought that the Holy Spirit condemns people to hell or bring condemnation but that is an act of the individuals heart caused by the law. Here is a very high density amount of the word he. However it is important to note that the Greek word translated he here really is gender neutral however the word translated Comforter is indeed masculine.
What is the relationship between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit? | Questions & Answers
The Holy Spirits work in the Church today is to complete the scripture in the lives of the believers. The primary way He did this was through the apostles, Luke and Mark writings after He arrived on the Earth.
However He guides us into all truth not just those expressly written in the Word. He is able to enlighten the eyes of our understanding so that we know. He does not speak of Himself which is why we only know Him through the writings in the word and what we have experienced of Him. He does not speak from his omniscience.
Trinity - Wikipedia
So it is, analogously, among human persons. A person discloses himself in his actions, and the better we know a person, the better we understand his actions. The three persons of the Trinity always work inseparably, for their work is always the work of the one God. The Son's will cannot be different from the Father's because it is the Father's.
They have but one will as they have but one being. Otherwise they would not be one God. According to Phillip Caryif there were relations of command and obedience between the Father and the Son, there would be no Trinity at all but rather three gods. Basil observes "When then He says, 'I have not spoken of myself', and again, 'As the Father said unto me, so I speak', and 'The word which ye hear is not mine, but [the Father's] which sent me', and in another place, 'As the Father gave me commandment, even so I do', it is not because He lacks deliberate purpose or power of initiation, nor yet because He has to wait for the preconcerted key-note, that he employs language of this kind.
His object is to make it plain that His own will is connected in indissoluble union with the Father.
Do not then let us understand by what is called a 'commandment' a peremptory mandate delivered by organs of speech, and giving orders to the Son, as to a subordinate, concerning what He ought to do. Let us rather, in a sense befitting the Godhead, perceive a transmission of will, like the reflexion of an object in a mirror, passing without note of time from Father to Son.
Athanasius of Alexandria explained that the Son is eternally one in being with the Father, temporally and voluntarily subordinate in his incarnate ministry. Likewise, the Cappadocian Fathers also insisted there was no economic inequality present within the Trinity. This theory was established by the Latin Fathers of the fourth and fifth centuries, especially by Hilary of PoitiersAugustineand Leo the Great.
Can you explain the Trinity?
In the Middle Ages, the theory was systematically taught by the Schoolmen such as Bonaventure. The Apostle John writes "God is love". Will I refuse to experience the love of God in my life simply because I can not understand yet all that God is?
I can know God and his love for me even if I neither fully comprehend what love is nor fully understand all characteristics of the nature of God. The Biblical definition of "Faith" is "entrusting myself to God" and believing that he will care for me.
Yes, it also is about knowing propositional truth, but this is not enough. There is something like "dead correctness". Faith is about life and a living relationship to a God who wants us to understand him more and more out of a trusting and loving relationship with him.
Let me share with you one last passage which goes back to the very beginning of all creation and revelation. I do not want to base the Trinity on the next verses that I am going to present, since there are a few conservative Christian scholars who think this would not be valid reasoning.
But they do nevertheless believe the Trinity is a strong Biblical doctrine. And as we have seen, many verses substantiate this doctrine. But I wonder if these following ones are really of so little value in regard to the doctrine of the Trinity. But see for yourself. Even in the very first chapter of the Bible, when we read the Creation story we can make some interesting observations: Our image verse 26 - his own image verse 27 in the next verse.
Not the image of angels, the image of God. One God, but somehow plural. And if that alone doesn't convince you, have you ever thought about the next part? The part where this being created in his image is described?
Somehow one person was not enough to represent God's image. God's image was created as a loving community in two persons, and two complementary persons at that - male and female with this strange urge to 'love' and serve each other and be a harmonious unity.
And, on top of it all, each human being, in the image of God, is a 'trinity', a multiple unity of body, soul and spirit, while still remaining one person, one being, one entity.
Do we want to 'demand' that God be 'less complex' than a human being who is "only" His image?
We read in Genesis 1: And God saw that it was good. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground. There "in the image of God" corresponds to "male and female". Mankind is 'one', but God sees the need to make two different and complementary beings in order to adequately represent his image.
- God in Three Persons: A Doctrine We Barely Understand
- Bible Verses About The Trinity
Even taken in isolation, this verse is a strong pointer towards the plurality of the nature of the one God, which the rest of the scriptures can then be seen to support. Even if some Christian scholars disagree, why do I still think that this really is a valuable additional reference, even though the Trinity is amply demonstrated in the other scriptures? Because even the Jewish Rabbis have a very hard time to come to terms with this passage. Several Rabbis tried to advance various explanations as to 'explain away' this plural but they only have managed to show that it won't go away.
Each subsequent Rabbi refutes the former ones and shows why their reasonings do not survive scrunity. But, maybe, as with so much, the concept of the Trinity might just be the solution to this problem too.
Have a look at the Jewish Rabbis' struggles at: Who has understood the mind of the LORD, or instructed him as his counselor? Whom did the LORD consult to enlighten him, and who taught him the right way? Who was it that taught him knowledge or showed him the path of understanding?